When Is My Child Emancipated?

By Sari M. Friedman, Legal Counsel 
Fathers' Rights Association – NYS & Long Island

How Old Do You Have To Be To Be Emancipated?

In New York State, a child is not emancipated until the age of 21 except under certain unusual circumstances. The important thing to remember is that emancipation is not automatic. You cannot emancipate a child, even when both parties agree to early emancipation or if your case fits some of the conditions we will outline here. That's something that must be done by the Court.

Ideally, parties will define emancipation events in their separation agreement or in their stipulation of settlement; but again, everything is dependent upon Court approval. People frequently agree in their separation agreement that, when a child is enrolled in a full time college and is pursuing an undergraduate degree, the age of emancipation is 22 years or the completion of four years of college, whichever comes first. Absent such an agreement, in all other instances, the age of emancipation is 21 unless certain other factors exist which may trigger an earlier emancipation upon application to a Court.

In this article, we will look at other factors that have led to early emancipation.

Permanent Residence Away From the Custodial Parent; Avoiding Parental Control

Residence at a boarding school, camp, or college is not an emancipation event. What then is?

In Roe v. Doe, the Court of Appeals made it clear that, when a minor of employable age and in full possession of his or her faculties, voluntarily and without cause, abandons the parent's HOME against the will of the parents and for the specific purpose of avoiding parental control, he or she forfeits the right to support.

This case involved an intact family, but would also apply to split families if the child so abandons the custodial home. But even here, the standards for abandonment are strict. It would not include, for example, a temporary summer residence with friends or off campus housing while attending school. It would not apply at all to a child who is 15 or younger because the child is not of an employable age.

In Conley v, Conley, a child under the age of 21 was arrested, adjudicated as a juvenile delinquent, and placed in a residential facility. The father attempted to terminate his child support payments because the child no longer resided in the mother's home. The Court ruled not to relieve the father of his duty to pay child support. Why? Because although the mother had temporarily lost custody of the child, she had not abdicated her parental role nor her responsibilities.

At the time of the hearings, the child was spending some weekends at home with his mother. She was responsible for his transportation to and from the facility and for all of his expenses during the visits. Obviously, the child did not voluntarily leave the custodial home in order to avoid parental control, and the custodial parent continued to exercise custodial rights over the child, with the child's return to home being the Court's goal.

Should the Court find that the child's decision to leave the parental home to live elsewhere was the fault of the parents, the parents will not be relieved of their obligation to support the child.

In one trial-level case, a child who was described by her parents as a model child left home after a heated argument with her mother and refused to return. The mother had a serious drinking problem and the father was too wrapped up in his work to worry much about the child. Further, the child's older brother was about to be released from jail, where he had served time for burglary. He had a history of violence against both the mother and child and the child feared his return.

In the Court's opinion, this was not a child seeking to avoid parental control. Rather, she was a child who had a rational fear of her brother's return and was desperately seeking the emotional support that she was not receiving at home.

In another case, a daughter moved out of her parental home against the wishes of her parents to live with a boyfriend. They later had a child. The Court declared the child emancipated, thus forfeiting her right to support even though she was on public assistance. The rationale? The girl had had the child after leaving her mother's home, against her mother's wishes, and to escape her mother's control. She also refused her father's offer to move in with him and his new wife. She clearly wanted to be free of her parents and do things her own way.

In a similar case, a child moved out of her mother's home to live with her boyfriend and child. But in this instance, the Court found that the child had no choice but to move out of her father's two-room efficiency apartment, which was too small to accommodate him, the child, and her baby.

What about a situation where a child moves out of the custodial home to live with the non-custodial parent? It is best to include in your original agreement or stipulation that, in this instance, child support payments shall end.

Full-Time Employment

A child may be emancipated if, at the age of 16 or over, he gets a full time job. Naturally, this rule excludes employment during school recess. Also, if the child ceases full-time employment before the age of 21, he or she is no longer emancipated unless there is a separate emancipation event.

In cases where the child works 30 to 35 hours a week and pays for his or her own car, phone, and other expenses, and also contributes to the custodial parent's budget for room and board, even at a modest level, the Courts have regularly declared such a child emancipated. However, if the child is a full-time student, then the Courts are reluctant to emancipate that child unless the child also pays all of his or her own costs of education.

A child who is of employable age and refuses to have a relationship with his or her father can be emancipated. This was especially so in N. Rosemary v. B. George, where the child adopted her step-father's name, had not visited her father in five years, and considered him to be her "biological" and not paternal father. In this instance, the Court granted emancipation.